When I was ten, I got the “kind of D&D, kind of AD&D” boxed set as a present. I don’t remember a ton of gaming presents beyond that, though there was the time the Harts got me some cards and my gratitude level was my typical “I’m more bemused than appreciative” level. So, it being Christmas doesn’t inspire this post.
Rather, seeing a third, yes, two more than one, movie this year helps inspire.
One thing I didn’t go into in my last post was how crazy the Weaknesses in Against the Dark Yogi are. If you think L5R’s disadvantages are way too painful, and you should, then AtDY is many times crazier. A number of them are missing limbs. Huh?!? Who thinks missing limbs are things PCs should have? Sure, some PC might have that, but it’s more in the 1% neighborhood rather than the 5% neighborhood. There’s like three Weaknesses I can see for most characters, and they are all far too gamey.
So, I watched a movie today where a main character essentially had no flaws. Cries of Mary Sue ring out. But, are flaws important? As I’ve said before, a noticeable change in protagonists of TV back in the day and TV nowadays is that current characters have to be tortured, angsty, or otherwise screwed up.
That’s not the only way to make interesting characters. Sure, literary Sherlock Holmes is not a ladykiller. Sure, John Carter, Superman, and a bunch of others suffer from boyus scouticus. But, I don’t need some crippling weakness to the allegorical color yellow, to wood, to Argonite. I just need someone who cares more about some things rather than other things. Bond cares about women with suggestive names, women who work for his enemies, women who happen to be anywhere in the vicinity. Sherlock doesn’t. He finds the peculiar and the clever interesting. Yes, in various games that would come out as “PsyLim: Must solve unusual mysteries”, but that’s a slippery slope to silliness as well as points for doing what your character should be doing anyway.
My other RPG in mind to run is Champions. I’ve never run Champions. I’ve built like a 1000 characters for Champions because that’s the way my mind sometimes works (worked?). I’ve lost interest in the disadvantage system for the game or anything remotely like it in other games. Yes, some things are disadvantages. Taking damage from being alive is worth points. Having enemies isn’t. PCs have enemies, whether they know it or not, otherwise they don’t have a story. Having a secret identity is a story element, not a structural disadvantage. This was the problem with such things as Dark Fate or Dark Secret in L5R – why do you get compensated for story aspects to your character?
Sure, some systems embrace the idea of forcing story and that mechanical constructs have built in story features. Rubbish. So unnecessary. One would think that being a 100% storyteller would mean liking narrative systems. Nope. See, here’s the thing. Stories are easy. Do D&D characters, whether oD&D, d20, or 4e come with disad mechanics? Are there stories told somewhere between the tactical wargame combats? I think so. Especially with d20, where there’s an actual skill system (not that it meant as much to D&D as it did a bunch of other d20 games).
Players should want their characters to be interesting, distinct, not in a “my +3 sword is +5 against red pandas” way. But, in a “then I played my drum for him, my best for him, and the King of All Demons wept” way.
Quirks, where you get some minimal character point bonus, make more sense to me than “start with 100 points, then spend roughly 150 on disads” because they aren’t a mess of game balance versus thematic plausibility.
It’s far more important for a group of PCs to have each PC have a role (usually involving some mechanical niche) than in having Power Crab be vulnerable to boiling water and butter.
So, I’m thinking when I run Champions that I just create 300+ point characters and only take into account Power Crab’s Vulnerability 2x Stun vs. attacks from below, rather than Power Crab’s PsyLim: Obsession with Goth Culture or how Power Crab is Hunted: The Galactic Gourmand, 11 or less.
Story problems are exactly that – parts of the story. Just like how Caste in AtDY doesn’t give or cost you any points, being a Dalit just makes things problematic when partying with the one-percenters until you achieve a blue hue in your skin. (I wonder how I incorporate a PC taking Shyama Varna when he’s in the Kshatriya Caste – I guess lowlifes will give him street cred of the “yo, bro, divine thug life!” type.)
Flaws are also far more interesting when they develop from play. I grow weary when players are supposed to write novellas about what they did before play began. Becoming – Enraged: When seeing idiotic parodies 14 or less, recover 8 or less – should occur from “well, that session sure wasn’t subtle”.
As for the movie, three stars. Solid, could have done some things better. Maybe I’ll get more specific later. Definitely didn’t inspire me to want to play in its world any more than I’m already not that interested in playing in its world, though.