Keep thinking of things that are ideas for something to write about but which may not have a lot of depth. Done right, this should have some meat.
By the way, post #300 of this blog.
Many speak of what you can do with the new Danse Macabre cards for V:TES. Why bother rehashing those thoughts? Let’s go on to how I might metagame for an environment in which people are going to be trying new cards.
Starting with the crypt cards, what crypt cards might get me to think about building decks differently?
Can’t be Archoned. But, does that matter to how I build decks? Sure, I run Archon a lot in tournament play because people bleed so uncontrollably in tournament play. But, a Mimir deck is likely to be Mimir doing the work, which means one action to care about a turn. Bounce or reduction makes that not hurt much. That leaves decks that can do neither. He can easily get by blocks with Form of Mist and whatever. But, again, I’m not terribly scared by proactive superstar decks. It’s the superstar wall decks that are incredibly annoying and, as I rarely play Pentex Subversion, his unPentexability is not terribly relevant to me.
But, what of a Mimir wall deck? He can Eternal Vigilance. He can’t be Kissed. He can Magic out a Sniper Rifle or Kevlar Vest or whatever. I’m just having a hard time seeing someone bother. It’s still not that hard to get by Animalism intercept. He’s not going to have a Bowl, though, sure, he could Sport Bike and Mr. Winthrop up. Other than immunity to Pentex, Misdirection, and miscellaneous annoyance master plays, why block?
Do I expect to see Abyssal Hunters everywhere? Not so much. More likely that her ability will discourage allies to some extent. Who am I kidding? Probably not at all, since it’s just one of your dudes who has her ability – just go murder the rest … since Lasombra block is not much of a thing.
Speaking of ally hate, getting to the point where there’s enough built in ally steal that I’m wondering when it hits the point that it’s a true deterrent. Entrancement can be DIed, but not Goulet, Xeper, Xipe. I’m not so much of a fan of the good allies since I hate popular things, so maybe it’s not all that relevant to have a Courier stolen or whatever. Plus, it’s not like other people find Goulet as fun to play as I do, etc.
Crypts – General
New !Brujah won’t really change that all sorts of folks will be trying new Pot/Pre cards. Just as new !Gangrel midcaps shouldn’t change how much !Gangrel see play. The new Lasombra I would expect to see encourage Lasombra decks. One is superefficient (though POT is of questionable importance), the other has all sorts of miscellaneous goodness to make up for being afflicted with 9-capness. But, does it matter? Stealth bleed, stealth vote – not exactly anything different to worry about. More Baltimore Purge chances is kind of “eh” as neither is terribly oriented to Purging.
The efficient !Trem midcaps encourage something, but what? One is Black Hand oriented, which isn’t likely to be as important as Recruitment Exercise for seeing BH, though Seraphity does mean more builds for Seraph oriented decks. The other’s voting prowess strikes me as more of a side effect than a deck driver. And, again, does this mean any sort of metagaming change? Not likely. Whereas, the new Tzimisce might. Group 4 Tzimisce were just so bad and group 2/3 was old. Filling in with some disciplined voters helps get closer to the amazing group 2/3 crypt. Could see Tzimisce vote, but that hardly matters – I’m already terribly concerned by voting. It’s the increased possibilities of wallish Tzimisce that would be a concern.
Now, each of the library cards (there aren’t that many).
Spoils of War
!Brujah seem to be everywhere. Of this and the Pot/Pre cards, I’d rate this the best, but is the bloating power of this card sufficient to change anything about deck choice or deck design? Does blocking become more important? Seems unlikely since the point of the new cards is to bruise blockers. I’ve already been in a situation where this card wins a war of attrition. It’s almost like everyone should play good stealth bleed, if they aren’t playing vote, as it’s still easy to rip through a !Brujah deck when you have the offense.
How thrilling. Just encourages stealth overkill. But, anyway, so I get blocked by a !Gangrel – do I care? It’s less scary than being blocked by a Toreador or a Second Traditioning Brujah. Encourage block deny? Well, as I’m not terribly into Giovanni, HoS, or Nagaraja these days, does it mean some slight increase in Elder Impersonations, like, from zero? Maybe.
Blood denial is just such a pain to have do anything, especially when The Coven sees play in every game. So, even with Public Vilification around to support it, I don’t see worrying about random blood burn. Bleed bounce is not disincentivized to any meaningful degree just because of new age Enticement decks. Is it worth running more bleed reduction to gum up Inside Dirt decks? Eh. It’s not like I expect a lot of Inside Dirt, like I expect a lot of !Brujah. Moving on.
Younger. So, Lutz and other Fear of Mekhet targets aren’t likely to get nailed by this. That’s unfortunate, though trading one vote deck for another hardly fixes how annoying voting is in the game. Unfortunately, if this sees play, and I’m not thinking it will see that much, it becomes Dmitra-like in how it’s a hassle to keep someone down, though Voter Captivation does a bang up job of making for full vampires all of the time, so whatever. Keep going.
Go in decks weak in intercept or strong in intercept? That makes a big difference. If the former, then it’s just feeding your stealth predator. If the latter, does that change expectations any? It’s more of a tactical (play) change than a strategic (metagaming) change to make.
Show of Force
Encourages bruise bleed. Doesn’t actually solve the problems of bruise bleed, which are: weak defenses; poor control elements. Just likely helps produce easy to oust decks. So, the question becomes how much you adapt to there being a bunch of forward looking, still pretty much helpless decks at tables. Do you try to save them by running more Eagle Sights, DIs, and Con Boons? Or, do you stealth bleed them out of existence when they cooperatively sit as your prey?
Then, if I’m inclined to play blocky decks, do I invest in more maneuvers, more damage prevent, and/or more other things to ignore combat?
I think I pretty much ignore this card’s existence. I don’t see that I’d change what I’d play or how I’d build decks just because it’s more likely to see some sketchy strategy.
Effect on random !Gangrel of seeing more multiacting !Gangrel decks doesn’t mean anything to me – not really any different than expecting Freak Drive out of Gangrel decks. This is all about superstars. In particular, in this area, I’d imagine The unnamed sees that much more play. Enkidu is not really that popular either up the coast nor down the coast. Mitru, Adana, … of course it’s all about Stanislava. Reasonably popular up here, tiresomely popular with Wedge down the coast. Even though she can already play Freak and Forced, it’s just one more reason to give her a go.
What’s interesting about the redundancy is that DI becomes less of a sure thing at stopping a multiturn. DI IT and FM or FD can DS (do shi-). Etc.
But, again, does it matter? Don’t think so. Fatties are already ubiquitous. Wrecking the life of 11-caps is a noble and righteous goal that all should embrace, regardless as to their religions. Maybe go from two Fear of Mekhets in every deck to three in a world with marginally more Adanas and Stanislavas.
Whether a card is good or not doesn’t necessarily affect whether I metagame against it. Maybe I feel vindicated by losing to bad cards rather than good in CCG play since that means I win the metagame subgame, but, mostly, I don’t like losing to strategies I find annoying. And, getting punked in V:TES is annoying. So, does that mean damage prevent? Maybe. I already went through my Flesh of Marble in every deck phase to counteract the flying animal menace. Maybe, it’s time to embrace Fortitude, except Fortitude damage prevent, with its zero impact on good strategies, just means someone else wins. Obedience is another way to go, but that means playing Dominate. Mental Maze, though I’m just contributing to a fattie world.
Not blocking at all means the superior is unregardable. So, a world of a bunch of forward moving, let the fattie vote decks and BBB decks win, decks is totally a possibility. Actually, even though it would further besmirch my tournament results, it is tempting to play Samedi, and they can slough combat like nobody’s business while also being awful at blocking. I’m sure I have some other ideas that would be similarly unconcerned by someone trying to inflict their Horseshoe deck upon me.
Lasombra combat. Ha ha, er, ha. When someone else plays this sort of deck, it will be a first.
Shakar: the Hunt
And, whether a card is good or not also doesn’t necessarily affect whether one will see it played. Given how bad BH decks are at fighting, maybe some superstar play – nah. Unregardable to the metagame.
So, will people finally start putting Gehenna-killing cards in their decks? Unlikely. I often can’t be bothered, even when I think of it. It’s not like event killers are any good at killing events. The Uncoiling can easily miss without just one event to nail. I’ve yet to be able to play Fourth Cycle.
Oh? Not everyone is going to play Watchtower: The Wolves Feed decks? Right. That’s too European for this state. Do typical BH decks need any particular metagaming against? Equipment kill/steal to prevent multibleed from Guarded Rubrics is something, I guess. Is that worth jumping through any sort of hoops rather than just bouncing and hoping for a DI on GR?
Hmmm, seems like DI keeps coming to mind. One wonders …
Esprit de Corps
First, not likely to influence how often people play Dementation, Dominate, or Presence. Nor do I care really about it being used for a bruise bleed or block strategy. The question for me is how much it will lead to swarm rush. Not expecting much of such decks as too many arrows point to bruise bleed builds until people tire of them.
Does make one wonder about .44s, even in a world with many more “maneuver to close” plays, especially with a permamaneuver to go with it. There really aren’t that many vampires who get a free maneuver. Nehsi is someone I can see playing, though 10 for him and 2 for a .44 seems counterproductive. Anton de Concepcion may see more play these days but probably not by me. Tammy Walenski is really interesting but expensive. Ysador the Foul – too expensive. Lazarus (adv) is hilarious – I need to build that deck. If only there were a cheaper vampire, like a 7 cap, with AUS and that already showed up in one of my more fun decks of recent times. If only.
Of course, many of these Pot-y decks could just as easily be playing hyperspeed Gates or Gates to the Vitals, so it’s kind of POinTless to get excited by “shoot for 2 with two maneuvers”.
So, in the end, I’m not really feeling doing any substantial metagaming different from what I’d already do. Maybe figure Animalism will be somewhat less prevalent in a world inclined to hyperspeed Gates and getting Slammed. Winnie Auspex seems less exciting unless it’s full of bounce to not have to block the Potencers as much. Questionably reducing the odds of seeing either of those, not that I see them that often, anyway, might free things up a bit to where some “this dies to Crows” deck or “important not to get blocked every action” deck might get the “I choose you” treatment.
Mostly, I just see a lot of new decks get eaten by any sort of solid stealth bleed deck, though that’s kind of something that should happen all of the time and only doesn’t because of regional biases against simple stealth bleed. So, whatever.